Press "Enter" to skip to content

Moving Towards Nationalization as Alarming Rate

When the federal government gave the first bailout to banks, it began to slide down a slippery slope. Now, we’re tumbling at full-speed:

But if hundreds of billions of dollars of new investment is needed to shore up those banks, and perhaps their competitors, what do taxpayers get in return? And how do the risks escalate as government’s role expands from a few bailouts to control over a vast portion of the financial sector of the world’s largest economy?

The Obama administration is making only glancing references to those questions. In an interview Sunday on “This Week” on ABC, the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, alluded to internal debate when she was asked whether nationalization, or partial nationalization, of the largest banks was a good idea.

“Well, whatever you want to call it,” said Ms. Pelosi, Democrat of California. “If we are strengthening them, then the American people should get some of the upside of that strengthening. Some people call that nationalization.

“I’m not talking about total ownership,” she quickly cautioned — stopping herself by posing a question: “Would we have ever thought we would see the day when we’d be using that terminology? ‘Nationalization of the banks?’ ”

To answer Speaker Pelosi”s question, everyone who opposed the first round of bailouts thought we would see that day. Expect the nationalization of banks to occur in the next 12 -24 months, and expect other industries to follow shortly thereafter.

Boy, I hope I’m wrong.